Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1890No. 20709PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

— The defendant was convicted of burglary, and appeals from the judgment rendered against him, and from an order refusing him a new trial. He demurred to the information, on the grounds,—1. That it did not conform substantially to the requirements of section 950, subdivision 2; 2. That the facts stated do not constitute a public offense; 3. That more than one offense is charged. His demurrer was overruled. He then pleaded not guilty, and was convicted as charged. After verdict, he moved in arrest of judgment, on the same grounds as those contained in the demurrer. The motion was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. People v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. People v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. GoldsworthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. People v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. State v. McGarrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  5. Porris v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API