Legal Opinion

People v. Sorrentino

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 1956No. Crim. 3222PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal of Bigarani

KAUFMAN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction after jury trial, on each of five counts of an indictment. The first count charged appellant Edward Bigarani and Frank Mendes, Steve Sorrentino and Edmund Lindsay with conspiracy to violate the provisions of section 211 of the Penal Code (robbery). The remaining counts charge all appellants with certain armed robberies that took place on February 18, 1955, at 185 Post Street, San Francisco. Bigarani appeals also from the order denying a new trial and from orders denying his motion to set aside and dismiss the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. People v. AlbertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. KynetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. MulqueenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. De Vries v. BrumbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. ValdiviaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. BowmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API