Legal Opinion

In re 1996 Nissan Sentra

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 25, 2001No. 2 CA-CY 00-0162PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLOREZ, J.

¶ 1 Appellant State of Arizona challenges the trial court’s grant of appellee Teruko Simmons’s cross-motion for summary judgment in this civil in rem forfeiture action against Simmons’s 1996 Nissan Sentra. The state contends that the trial court erred in finding that 1) prior statements made by Simmons’s son, Dennis Day, which the state and Simmons had attached to their respective motions for summary judgment, were inadmissible hearsay; 2) the racketeering forfeiture statutes do not apply to this action; and 3) Simmons’s interest in the Nissan is exempt from forfeiture. The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  2. Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Ruiz v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Enterprise Leasing Co. of Phoenix v. EhmkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. In re United States Currency in the Amount of $315,900.00Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Braillard v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. Green v. Lisa Frank, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. Beau Hodai v. the City of Tucson and Tucson Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. State Ex Rel. Napolitano v. GravanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  5. STATE, EX REL. HORNE v. CamposCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API