McLaughlin & Freeman v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Keefe, Judge:
The merchandise in question, invoiced as peanut-acid oil, was assessed for duty by the collector as a nonenumerated manufactured article at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph *1871558 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The plaintiff claims that the material is a waste and as such properly dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1555. By way of amendment of the protest, it is further claimed that the material is a raw or unmanufactured article and dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558.
At the trial counsel for the plaintiff introduced in evidence as…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Protest 63972-K of W. A. Cleary Corp.United States Customs Court · 1947
- Werner G. Smith Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951