Legal Opinion

McLaughlin & Freeman v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 14, 1946No. C. D. 1008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keefe, Judge:

The merchandise in question, invoiced as peanut-acid oil, was assessed for duty by the collector as a nonenumerated manufactured article at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph *1871558 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The plaintiff claims that the material is a waste and as such properly dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1555. By way of amendment of the protest, it is further claimed that the material is a raw or unmanufactured article and dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558.

At the trial counsel for the plaintiff introduced in evidence as…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Protest 63972-K of W. A. Cleary Corp.United States Customs Court · 1947
  2. Werner G. Smith Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API