Legal Opinion

Procter & Gamble Co. v. Quality King Distributors, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 3, 1997No. CV 95-3113 (ADS)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

This case involves the alleged misuse of the waste products of a shampoo called Head & Shoulders. The action arises from the claims of the plaintiff-counterclaim defendant, Procter & Gamble Company (“P & G”), against numerous parties, including Quality King Distributors, Inc. (“Quality King”) and Omnisource International, Inc. (“Omni”), who it alleges were mixing, bottling, selling and distributing potentially harmful, counterfeit Head & Shoulders shampoo, in violation of the Lanham Trade-Mark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq. Presently before…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. International Audiotext Network, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wahlstrom v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  2. Gucci America, Inc. v. Duty Free Apparel, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  3. Fagan v. AmerisourceBergen Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2004
  4. D'Annunzio v. Ayken, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  5. Greater New York Automobile Dealers Ass'n v. Environmental Systems Testing, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API