Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Peterson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2016No. 20150363PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Robert Peterson appeals from a district court order finding him in contempt of court for failing to pay spousal support. Robert Peterson argues the district court erred finding him in contempt, not modifying the spousal support obligation and awarding attorneys fees. The district court order is affirmed.

<

[¶ 2] Robert and Vineca Peterson divorced in 1996. The district court ordered Robert Peterson to pay spousal support of $1,500 per month until Vineca Peterson either died or remarried. In January 2015 Vineca Peterson petitioned the district court to find Robert…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Flattum-Riemers v. Flattum-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Sall v. SallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Lauer v. LauerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Booen v. AppelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Rasmussen v. HarveyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Smith v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Peterson v. SchulzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Upton v. NolanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API