Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Schulz

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2017No. 20160377PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crothers, Justice.

[¶ 1] Aeryn Peterson appeals from an order to show cause and an order finding her in contempt. She argues the district court abused its discretion by finding her in contempt and ordering her to pay Cody Schulz’s attorneys fees. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Peterson and Schulz have one child together, who was born in 2004. In 2011, a judgment awarded Peterson primary residential responsibility of the child and Schulz was awarded parenting time. In 2013, the judgment was amended to modify Schulz’s parenting time. Schulz was awarded parenting time every Wednesday evening and every other…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tibbetts v. DornheimNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Peterson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Jordet v. JordetNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Dieterle v. DieterleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Nuveen v. NuveenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kettle Butte Trucking LLC v. Steven A. Kelly & Spirit Energy LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. ThorntonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Grengs v. GrengsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. In Re: Western Sales Trading Company v. GenPro International, Inc. (Guam), and FPD Food International Inc. a.k.a. 7D Food International, Inc., Real Party in Interest-AppelleeSupreme Court of Guam · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API