Legal Opinion

Upton v. Nolan

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 2018No. 20180119PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crothers, Justice.

[¶ 1] James Nolan appeals from an order holding him in contempt and requiring that he reimburse Heather Upton for parenting time travel expenses and pay her attorney fees. We conclude the district court erred in amending the parties' divorce judgment and in ordering Nolan to reimburse Upton for his share of parenting time travel expenses. We conclude the court did not abuse its discretion in holding Nolan in contempt and in awarding Upton attorney fees. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I

[¶ 2] Upton and Nolan, both members of the United States Air Force, were divorced in…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Greenwood v. GreenwoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Sall v. SallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Fleck v. Jacques Seed Co., Prescott, WisconsinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kuntz v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Arnold v. Trident ResourcesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Canerdy v. CanerdyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Kuntz v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API