Legal Opinion

Smith v. Erickson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2019No. 20180124PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crothers, Justice.

[¶1] Eric Smith appeals from district court orders and judgment related to child custody, dismissal of motions for contempt and the court finding him a vexatious litigant. We affirm, concluding the district court did not err in its orders and judgment regarding parenting responsibility, contempt and finding Smith a vexatious litigant.

I

[¶2] Smith and Erickson are the biological parents of a child born in 2014. On November 18, 2015, Smith commenced an action to determine primary residential responsibility, decision-making authority and child support. The first judgment was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. ZiebarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Montgomery v. MontgomeryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Matter of Emelia Hirsch TrustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Peterson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Solwey v. SolweyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Cook v. CookNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Buchholz v. MayoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  4. City of Dickinson v. HelgesonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026
  5. Smith v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API