Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Ylitalo

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 18, 1988No. C1-85-1550PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This case arises from the respondent’s failure to timely file state and federal income tax returns and an alleged trust account shortage.

On September 3, 1985, respondent was publicly reprimanded and placed on supervised probation for two years. This discipline was imposed pursuant to a stipulation between respondent and the director wherein respondent admitted to a shortage in his trust account in September 1982 in the amount of $187.87 and for failure to maintain proper trust journals in 1983 and 1984.

On January 15, 1987, the director filed a petition for revocation of probation and further…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Discipline of BunkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. In Re the Discipline of SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. In Re Application for Discipline of HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Matter of Discipline of FlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. In Re the Discipline of ScallenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against MoultonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against ThedensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GurstelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. In Re the Application for the Discipline of PetersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API