Legal Opinion

Wire v. Slocum

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 4, 1921No. 9992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Grant County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action . by Minnie Slocum and others against C. S. Wire for the conversion of wheat. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defend'ant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCollier, J.

This is an action for damages, instituted by the defendants in error, hereinafter called plaintiffs, against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant for the wrongful conversion of wheat.

The defendant demurred to the petition, which demurrer was overruled and defendant excepted.

The evidence is undisputed that the plaintiffs had sold to the defendant the land upon which the wheat alleged to have been converted was-grown, and executed a deed to defendant in which no part of the crop growing upon said land at the time of the sale was reserved; that the said defendant appropriated to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Aylesbury Mercantile Co. v. FitchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Bilby v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Strickler v. GitchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  4. Oland v. MalsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Dannefer v. AurandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southwest State Bank v. Ellis (In Re Ellis)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2004
  2. Terwilleger v. BullSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Oklahoma State Bank of Enid v. BucknerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Dick v. HornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API