Dick v. Horn

Opinion by

LYONS, C.

This controversy arises from the interpretation of the following contract:

“This agreement, made and entered into by and between Herman Horn, the party of the first part, and R. Dick, party of the second part:

tion of $650.00, leases to said second party the S. y2 of N. E. Vi and N. % of S. E. 3-10-17, from date, and the S. Vz of S. E. 3-10-17 from Oct. 20, 1918, and all to expire January

“Party of the first part, for a considera-3. 1919. Said second party to have all the crops and to have the, pasture, but not to have use of dwelling. Said second party not to pasture alfalfa…