Legal Opinion

Tidewater Oil Company v. George E. Jackson and Karl B. Jackson, Doing Business in Partnership as Jackson Brothers

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 18, 1963No. 6944PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in a diversity suit for damages, brought by a Kansas oil and gas leaseholder against an adjoining leaseholder, for the wrongful water flooding of his lease. Water flooding is a legally and scientifically accepted method of producing oil and gas by the introduction of foreign water into an oil bearing for,matÍOn’ ^ally after primary í°n ho/?s are™ ,lonfr Profitable, G“erallylthe method involves the inter^ctmnofwater under pressure, into strategical^ located input wells, for the ™se gating a water drive, whlch pU+?es ««dual…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. US v. Don Fernando De La Maza Arredondo & OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Turner v. Big Lake Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Railroad Commission of Texas v. ManzielTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Watkins v. LaytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Palma v. PowersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
  3. Cassinos v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. South Bend Federation of Teachers v. National Education Ass'n-South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Fransen v. Conoco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API