Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. Royal Salt Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1911No. 17,037PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Ellsworth district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

In the course of its operations in mining rock salt the Royal Salt Company deposited upon its own land a quantity of refuse salt, which in a few years created a dump containing about 40,000 tons. S. J. Gilmore, the owner of an adjacent tract, claimed that the rain dissolved a part of this salt and by percolation carried it into the soil of his land, injuring the vegetation and imparting a saltish taste to a number of springs. He asked an injunction against the practice. He was denied relief and appeals.

The trial court found in effect that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Emporia v. SodenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Hathorn v. . Natural Carbonic Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Kinnaird v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Helms v. Eastern Kansas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Sharp v. 251st Street Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Swift & Co. v. Peoples Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  4. Berry v. Shell Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Atkinson v. Virginia Oil & Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API