Legal Opinion
United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 28, 1995No. Civ. A. 89-CV 1657PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
VANASKIE, District Judge.
This cost recovery action by the United States (the “Government”) under Section 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a), is before this Court on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. This Court was directed to determine whether defendant Alcan Aluminum Corporation (“Al-can”) can avoid or limit liability that otherwise may be imposed as a result of the fact that its used oil emulsion had been commingled with other oily wastes containing hazardous…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Compaction Systems Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- United States of America, State of New York v. Alcan Aluminum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Usa, Acting at Request of the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (Epa) v. Olin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Hercules, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Rohm and Haas Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.