Mintz v. Soule
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Vfayne; Gage, J., presiding. Assumpsit by Samuel Mintz against Elmer F. Soule and others upon an appeal bond. Judgment of non-suit for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
This action is brought by plaintiff on the appeal bond given in the case of Mintz v. Soule, 182 Mich. 564.
Upon the trial in the circuit court the plaintiff introduced his proofs and rested. Defendants offered no testimony, but, having rested, made a motion for a directed verdict. This motion was argued, but before it had been finally decided plaintiff asked for a continuance, which was denied; he then asked leave to submit to a nonsuit, which was likewise denied, and a verdict for defendants was directed. Thereafter plaintiff made a motion for a new trial, which was refused. He then made a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Deneen v. Houghton County Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Davis v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Mintz v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kolodziejczak v. BakMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Slowke v. AltermattMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Danziger v. Village of Bingham FarmsMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- McNichol v. Consumers' Power Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1921
- Consumers' Power Co. v. McNicholCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923