Legal Opinion

Slowke v. Altermatt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1940No. Docket 23, Calendar 40,883PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiff’s decedent, Paul Slowke, while crossing on foot Gratiot avenue in the city of Detroit was struck by an automobile owned by defendant Clarence Altermatt and driven with his knowledge and consent by his son, the defendant Robert Altermatt. Slowke was instantly killed. At the close of plaintiff’s proofs and during the absence of the jury the defendants made a motion for a directed verdict. Among the reasons assigned in support of defendants ’ motion were the following: that plaintiff’s decedent was guilty of contributory negli genee, and that plaintiff brought his suit solely under the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pear v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Mintz v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reed v. Burton Abstract & Title Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Danziger v. Village of Bingham FarmsMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Wicks v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Slowke v. AltermattMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API