McNichol v. Consumers' Power Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
At I,aw. Action by Effie R. McNichol against the Consumers’ Power Company.
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, District Judge.
This is a motion for a new trial. The sole question involved is whether, under the circumstances disclosed, fine plaintiff is entitled to a voluntary nonsuit.
The action is trespass on the case for damages. On the trial in open court, after opening statements by counsel for both parties, six witnesses were sworn on behalf of the plaintiff, and examined and cross-examined by counsel for plaintiff and defendant, respectively. Thereupon, without resting her case, the plaintiff moved for a voluntary nonsuit. By affidavit filed in the cause, it appears that defendant had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barrett v. Virginian Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Deneen v. Houghton County Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Davis v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Mintz v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by1 opinion
- Consumers' Power Co. v. McNicholCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923