State v. Elkins
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtLau, J.
¶1 The jury convicted Christine Elkins of attempting to elude a pursuing police vehicle, driving under the influence (DUI), second degree assault, felony hit and run, and bail jumping. Elkins argues that the trial court erred by (1) admitting her custodial statements without Miranda1 warnings, (2) failing to exclude the video and sound recording in violation of Washington’s privacy act, (3) admitting her refusal to submit to a breath test despite misleading implied consent warnings, and (4) refusing to exercise its discretion to impose a mitigated sentence for the hit and run conviction. We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Gonzales v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. BartelsWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. BostromWashington Supreme Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lynch v. Department of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. ElkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State Of Washington v. Darren J. RobisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Allen v. Department of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- City Of Vancouver, V Melissa Nicole KaufmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.