Legal Opinion

Gulf, C. &. S. F. Ry. Co. v. Locker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 11, 1924No. 6770PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

Appellee sued appellant to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained while engaged in the performance of his duties incident to the coupling of cars for appellant. Appellee, a brakeman on a freight train in the employ of appellant, engaged at the time of his injuries in handling interstate commerce, alleged that the appellant had failed to equip the ears he was handling with couplers coupling automatically by impact, in consequence of which he was injured, and that the appellant, at the time of the injury, was hauling and using the said cars not so equipped with…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. LindsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. WagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. McGowan v. Denver & R. G. W. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Friesenhahn v. Tips Engine WorksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. LockerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API