Legal Opinion

Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Gardner

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 22, 1924No. 6780PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLENDON, C. J.

The appellees, Mrs. T. A. Gardner and her husband, T. A.’ Gardner, recovered a judgment in the district court of Lampasas county against appellant, Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Company, for 815,000 as compensatory damages for personal injuries which Mrs. Gardner sustained as a result of stepping into a hole at a point where Elm street crosses the right of way of appellant in the town of Lometa. The appeal is from this judgment.- The case is briefed under 10 propositions, supported by 15 assignments of error, which we will consider in the order of their presentation.

The first 4…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gussie Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. American Indemnity Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Northern Texas Traction Co. v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Martin v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Wells v. FordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. PRC Kentron, Inc. v. First City Center Associates, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  4. Skaggs v. Grisham-Hunter Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API