Legal Opinion

Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Locker

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1925No. 709-4270PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChapman, J.

Defendant in error, Locker, was an employee of plaintiff in error, railway company; in the capacity of brakeman. While Locker and other members of the train crew were doing switching at McGregor, two freight cars of the railway company failed to couple on the first trial. The cars were being used in interstate traffic, and were loaded with steel rails. After the two cars had failed to couple, and, while they were about 12 feet apart, and neither of them moving, Locker went between them, as he claims, to adjust the couplers, and, after making such adjustment as he thought necessary, signaled…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ConleyTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. ConleyTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Gulf, C. &. S. F. Ry. Co. v. LockerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Swann v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Northern Texas Traction Co. v. ThetfordTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Texas & N. O. R. v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Friesenhahn v. Tips Engine WorksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Lightsey v. RadtkeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API