State v. Bryant
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment convicting defendant of consensual sodomy. The facts are not seriously in dispute and therefore only those necessary to the resolution of the issue raised will be presented.
Montgomery Ward and Company operates a large department store in St. Paul. For the convenience of the public it provides restrooms. The men’s restroom involved here contained a number of toilet stalls, 2 feet 9 inches wide and approximately 5 feet in depth. They were separated by metal partitions beginning about 12 1/2 inches above the floor and extending to within 3…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bielicki v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Britt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Douglas Aircraft Co. v. CranstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. HenselCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- People v. MercadoNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Buchanan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- United States v. Alphonso Nerber Eduardo Alvarez Alberto Betancourt Ramon Betancourt-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. KimDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1976
- State v. HoltOregon Supreme Court · 1981
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.