Legal Opinion

Frank W. Smith Janice M. Smith v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 16, 2003No. 02-20640PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs-Appellants Frank and Janice Smith appeal the district court’s order granting the Defendant-Appellee United States’s motion for summary judgment and denying their motion for summary judgment. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

A. Facts

This case centers on whether Frank and Janice Smith (“the Smiths”) are subject to penalties and interest due to their under payment of income taxes for tax years 1983 and 1984. The parties agree on the following facts.

The Smiths were limited partners in Barrister Equipment Associates Series 166 (“Barrister…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Daniels v. City of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  3. Maxwell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  4. Verone Marin Fehlhaber, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Robert F. Fehlhaber, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Sam R. Rovetuso, Tommy Hendrix and Juan WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Black v. North Panola School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  2. Mark Wallach v. Eaton CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  3. Excel Willowbrook, L.L.C. v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  4. Deville v. United States ex rel. United States Department of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  5. Weichsel Farm, L.P. v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API