Legal Opinion
Mark Wallach v. Eaton Corp
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 7, 2016No. 15-3320PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
KRAUSE, Circuit Judge.
In this case, we are called upon to deter-mine, among other things, the fount and contours of federal common law applicable to the assignment of federal antitrust claims and the reach of the presumption of timeliness for motions to intervene as rep-resentatives of a class. Consistent with the Restatement of Contracts and the doc-trines undergirding federal antitrust law, we hold that an assignment of a federal antitrust claim need not be supported by bargained-for consideration in order to confer direct purchaser _ standing on an indirect purchaser;…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- In Re Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Joan Kedra v. Richard SchroeterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- E.O.H.C. v. Secretary United States DepartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Liana Revock v. Cowpet Bay West Condominium AsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Covertech Fabricating, Inc. v. TVM Building Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.