Legal Opinion
United States v. Sam R. Rovetuso, Tommy Hendrix and Juan Williams
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 27, 1985No. 83-3302, 83-3303 and 84-1174PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
In 1983, the defendants-appellants, Sam R. Rovetuso, Tommy Hendrix, and Juan Williams, were indicted for and convicted of attempting to interfere with the testimony of a government witness in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512 (Count I). They were also convicted of obstructing justice under 18 U.S.C. § 1503 (Count II) and conspiring to intimidate a witness (Count IY). They appeal their convictions raising a number of allegedly prejudicial evidentiary rulings and challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm.
I
The parties stipulated at the defendants’ trial that from…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. John M. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Miguel SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- United States v. Arnold Sherlock and Ronald CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. James GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Manuel Flores, United States of America v. Juan Raul GarzaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Thomas J. MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. David L. HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.