Jvc Co. of America, Div. of US Jvc Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARMAN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, JVC Company of America, moves for summary judgment pursuant to U.S. CIT R. 56(a), contending it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law because the United States Customs Service (Customs) improperly classified the merchandise at issue under subheading 8525.30.00, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), as “television cameras,” dutiable at a rate of 4.2% ad valorem, 1 Plaintiff argues the imported merchandise should have been classified under either subheading 8543.80.90, HTSUS, as “electrical machines and apparatus, having individual…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Rollerblade, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jvc Company of America, Division of Us Jvc Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Sarne Handbags Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Toy Biz, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Wagner Spray Tech Corp., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.