Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Proceeding before the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 12, 2015No. Nos. 13-3853, 13-3854, 13-3855, 13-4070, 13-4269, 13-4325Published

1ConcurrenceMcKEE, Chief Judge

I agree with the Majority’s conclusions that this action was properly removed under the federal officer removal statute, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442(a)(1), (d)(1) (2012), and that any state law cause of action is preempted. I therefore join the Majority Opinion in its entirety. .Nevertheless, I feel compelled to write separately to amplify the context of this dispute and to stress that the Commonwealth is not actually proceeding on a state law theory at all, despite its claims to the contrary.

I. Context

Although it does not alter our legal analysis of the issues before us, it is difficult not to wonder…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API