United States v. Dico, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT W. PRATT, District Judge.
Before the Court is the United States of America’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Arranger Liability (“Plaintiffs Motion”), filed June 8, 2012. Clerk’s No. 61. On July 9, 2012, Dico, Inc. (“Dico”) and Titan Tire Corporation (“Titan”) (collectively “Defendants”) filed their *1142Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion. Clerk’s No. 68. On July 25, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Reply Memorandum. Clerk’s No. 78. On August 22, 2012, the Court held a hearing on Plaintiffs Motion.1 See Clerk’s No. 86. The matter is fully submitted.
1. PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wilson Road Development Corp. v. Fronabarger Concreters, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2013
- United States v. Dico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Dico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Dico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Dico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015