United States v. Dico, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BENTON, Circuit Judge.
*1177 Dico and Titan appeal the district court's 1 finding that they violated the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), that they are jointly and severally liable for response costs, and that Dico is liable for punitive damages. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , this court affirms.
I
Dico, Inc. owned several buildings in Des Moines contaminated with Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in the insulation. In 1994, the Environmental Protection Agency issued an administrative order that Dico remove some of the PCB…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Schaub v. VonWaldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States of America v. Dico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Hercules, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Matthew CoyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Short Creek Development, LLC v. MFA IncorporatedDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2023
- Short Creek Development, LLC v. MFA IncorporatedDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2023
- State of New Jersey v. J.H.P.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2024