Legal Opinion

Honeywell International Inc. and Honeywell Intellectual Properties, Inc. v. the United States 0

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 5, 2014No. 02-1909CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER

SUSAN G. BRADEN, Judge

On June 14, 2005, the court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order ascertaining that it had jurisdiction to adjudicate the claims in the May 31, 2005 Amended Complaint. See Honeywell Int’l Inc. v. United States, 66 Fed.Cl. 400, 419-20 (2005). Aso on June 14, 2005, the court construed the claims of Patent Number 6,467,914 (the ’914 patent). See id. at 428-87 (2005). On March 25, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, on rehearing, held that the ’914 patent was valid and non-obvious. Honeywell Int’l Inc. v. United…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Honeywell International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Honeywell International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Honeywell International Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Perry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API