Honeywell International Inc. and Honeywell Intellectual Properties, Inc. v. the United States 0
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER
SUSAN G. BRADEN, Judge
On June 14, 2005, the court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order ascertaining that it had jurisdiction to adjudicate the claims in the May 31, 2005 Amended Complaint. See Honeywell Int’l Inc. v. United States, 66 Fed.Cl. 400, 419-20 (2005). Aso on June 14, 2005, the court construed the claims of Patent Number 6,467,914 (the ’914 patent). See id. at 428-87 (2005). On March 25, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, on rehearing, held that the ’914 patent was valid and non-obvious. Honeywell Int’l Inc. v. United…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Honeywell International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Honeywell International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Honeywell International Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
3Cited by1 opinion
- Perry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020