Legal Opinion
Honeywell International, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 25, 2010No. 08-5181rPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge MAYER.
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Honeywell International, Inc. and Honeywell Intellectual Properties, Inc. (collectively, Honeywell) appeal from a final judgment of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. The Court of Federal Claims held that the government infringed independent claim 2 of the patent-in-suit but that this claim is invalid. The Court of Federal Claims also held that Honeywell lacks standing on its claim for just compensation under the Invention Secrecy Act and that the first sale doctrine precludes Honeywell from recovering damages for one…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Vas-Cath Incorporated and Gambro, Inc. v. Sakharam D. Mahurkar, and Quinton Instruments CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Exxon Research and Engineering Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Santarus, Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Alcon Research, Ltd. v. Apotex Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Mrc Innovations, Inc. v. Hunter Mfg., LLPCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Utto Inc. v. Metrotech Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.