Legal Opinion

Honeywell International, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 14, 2005No. 02-1909CPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CONSTRUING CERTAIN CLAIMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 6,467,914

BRADEN, Judge.

In the decade following the United States Supreme Court’s unanimous affirmance of the landmark en banc decision in Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 52 F.3d 967, 978-79 (Fed.Cir.1995) (“Markman F), aff'd, 517 U.S. 370, 116 S.Ct. 1384, 134 L.Ed.2d 577 (1996) (“Markman IF), the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has devoted a great deal of effort to provide federal trial courts with a workable analytical framework to construe the meaning of a patent’s claims that is…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Honeywell International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Honeywell International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Honeywell International Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Honeywell International Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. Honeywell International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API