Legal Opinion
Honeywell International Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 5, 2012No. 02-1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*661MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON REMAND REGARDING THE INVENTION SECRECY ACT AND PATENT INFRINGEMENT DAMAGES
Susan G. Braden, Judge
This Memorandum Opinion first addresses the issues to be adjudicated on remand under the Invention Secrecy Act, 35 U.S.C. §§ 181-88 (“the Invention Secrecy Act”), and then turns to patent infringement damages to which Honeywell is entitled under 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a).
To facilitate a review of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, the court has provided the following outline:
I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND SCOPE OF THE REMAND.
II. DISCUSSION.
A. Issues To Be Adjudicated…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Federal Aviation Administration v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Laserdynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Liberty Ammunition, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Honeywell International Inc. and Honeywell Intellectual Properties, Inc. v. the United States 0United States Court of Federal Claims · 2014