Legal Opinion
Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Trucking Associations
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided August 2, 1984No. 82-1643PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall
This case presents a challenge to an effort by the Interstate Commerce Commission to create a new remedy to enforce motor-carrier rate-bureau agreements. The remedy at issue is the Commission’s authority to reject effective tariffs that have been submitted in substantial violation of rate-bureau agreements. As we have recognized in the past, the Interstate Commerce Commission (Commission or ICC) has discretion to fashion remedies in furtherance of its statutory responsibilities. Trans Alaska Pipeline Rate Cases, 436 U. S. 631, 654 (1978). Although rejection of effective tariffs is a form of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Trans Alaska Pipeline Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Municipal Light Boards of Reading and Wakefield Massachusetts v. Federal Power Commission, Boston Edison Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Security Services, Inc. v. Kmart Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Paul E. Oberstar v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.