Legal Opinion

Mottahedeh Creations, Ltd. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 8, 1959No. C.D. 2095PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

The merchandise in the case at bar consists of certain articles composed of wrought iron, which were classified under paragraph 1518 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 51802, supplemented by T.D. 51898, as articles in chief value of artificial flowers, fruits, or leaves, composed wholly or in chief value of “other” materials. In protests 293986-K and 297523-K herein, the rate of duty assessed was 45 per centum ad valorem. The merchandise covered by the remaining protests was classified under the same paragraph of the act,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. Cochran Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  4. United States v. Ben Felsenthal & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. L. Tobert Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Joseph Markovits, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Novik & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. Block v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  4. J. Gerber & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  5. Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API