Mayer v. New York Life Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Circuit Judge.
The sole legal question involved in this ease is whether the death of a passenger killed by the fall of an airplane upon a regularly scheduled trip “resulted * * * from engaging, as a passenger or otherwise, in * * * aeronautic operations.”
The facts are not in dispute. The appellee insured the decedent of the appellants under a policy which carried a provision for double indemnity benefit in ease of death by accidental means. The policy provided that “This Double Indemnity Benefit will not apply if the Insured’s death resulted * * * from engaging, as a passenger or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Masonic Accident Insurance v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
- Head v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Benefit Ass'n Railway Employees v. HaydenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Pittman v. Lamar Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
- Gits v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clapper v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- Day v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Massachusetts Protective Ass'n v. BayersdorferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Bayersdorfer v. Massachusetts Protective Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1937
- Christen v. New York Life Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.