Legal Opinion

Mayer v. New York Life Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 7, 1934No. 6502PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Circuit Judge.

The sole legal question involved in this ease is whether the death of a passenger killed by the fall of an airplane upon a regularly scheduled trip “resulted * * * from engaging, as a passenger or otherwise, in * * * aeronautic operations.”

The facts are not in dispute. The appellee insured the decedent of the appellants under a policy which carried a provision for double indemnity benefit in ease of death by accidental means. The policy provided that “This Double Indemnity Benefit will not apply if the Insured’s death resulted * * * from engaging, as a passenger or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Masonic Accident Insurance v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Head v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  3. Benefit Ass'n Railway Employees v. HaydenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Pittman v. Lamar Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
  5. Gits v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clapper v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  2. Day v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  3. Massachusetts Protective Ass'n v. BayersdorferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  4. Bayersdorfer v. Massachusetts Protective Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1937
  5. Christen v. New York Life Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API