Legal Opinion

Benefit Ass'n Railway Employees v. Hayden

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 28, 1927PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The appellant insurance company issued its policy of insurance to Paul Trotter, a telegraph operator, insuring his life in the isum of $3,000, and appellee was designated as the beneficiary therein. This suit was brought by the beneficiary to recover on this -policy, and the cause was submitted to the court below, sitting aw a jury, on the following- agreed statement of facts:

“We agree that Paul Trotter, the insured, was killed at Stuttgart, Arkansas, on October 17, 1926, in an airplane accident. The facts in relation to the accident or how it occurred are as follows:
“Bichard Schillberg was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miller v. Illinois Bankers' Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  2. Benham v. American Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Barnett v. Merchants' Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Boatwright v. American Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  5. Nutt v. Security Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Masonic Accident Insurance v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BelsheSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  3. Charette v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. James Q. Bryan and Gratha Bryan v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  5. Missouri State Life Insurance v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API