Legal Opinion

Pullins v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1982No. 15879-PRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

We granted the petition of Cecil Pullins for review of a memorandum decision of the Court of Appeals which affirmed a decision of the administrative law judge that the prior loss of sight in one eye was not an earning capacity disability. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24 and Rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.

The facts necessary for a determination of this case are as follows. During childhood, Pullins had sustained an injury to his right eye resulting in blindness in that eye. On 1 October 1971, Pullins suffered an industrial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ronquillo v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Alsbrooks v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Ross v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  4. McKinney v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Wollum v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Young v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  2. PFS v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. Special Fund Division v. TaborCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  4. Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. Conner Manufacturing, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API