Pullins v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
We granted the petition of Cecil Pullins for review of a memorandum decision of the Court of Appeals which affirmed a decision of the administrative law judge that the prior loss of sight in one eye was not an earning capacity disability. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24 and Rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.
The facts necessary for a determination of this case are as follows. During childhood, Pullins had sustained an injury to his right eye resulting in blindness in that eye. On 1 October 1971, Pullins suffered an industrial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ronquillo v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Alsbrooks v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Ross v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- McKinney v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Wollum v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Young v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- PFS v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Special Fund Division v. TaborCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Conner Manufacturing, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.