Legal Opinion

Young v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 11, 2003No. 1 CA-IC 02-0072PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINTHROP, Judge.

¶ 1 We must decide in this special action whether the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) erred by awarding scheduled bene*269fits for petitioner Larry Young’s Arizona industrial injury.1 Petitioner contends that his injury should be unscheduled because of two prior out-of-state industrial awards. For the reasons that follow, we hold that if a prior out-of-state industrial injury resulted in an award that would have been scheduled had it occurred in Arizona, a loss of earning capacity for such injury is conclusively presumed, and a subsequent Arizona scheduled industrial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ronquillo v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Alsbrooks v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. PFS v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Landon v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  2. Patches v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. Schuck & Sons Construction v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. Gutierrez v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. Aguayo v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API