Snow v. Mikenas
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
We hold that, on the facts of these appeals, the Probate Court judge was entitled to inquire on his own into the reasonableness of contingent fee agreements between legatees or heirs and their attorneys and that the judge properly could require those attorneys to establish the reasonableness of the contingent fee agreements as a condition to their receipt of fees pursuant to those agreements.
Calas Mikenas died testate on December 1,1958. Under his will he gave the residue of his estate to Antanas Mikenas and Petras Mikenas, children of his deceased brother. Each was a resident of Lithuania in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- First National Bank of Boston v. BrinkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- McInerney v. Massasoit Greyhound Association, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Cameron v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Mikshis v. PalionisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
3Cited by13 opinions
- Northern Heel Corp. v. Compo Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Beit v. PROBATE & FAMILY COURT DEPARTMENTMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Continental Casualty Co., Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- In Re Zyprexa Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Salem Realty Co. v. MateraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.