Legal Opinion
Northern Heel Corp. v. Compo Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 30, 1988No. 87-1422, 87-1423PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
After defendant-appellant Compo Industries, Inc. (Compo) negotiated a purchase and sale agreement (the Agreement) referable to the assets of plaintiff-appellee Northern Heel Corporation (Noheel), it failed to close and instead invited renegotiation of the sale at a reduced price. 1 No-heel declined the invitation, insisted that the closing should have gone forward as originally agreed, and brought suit. Compo counterclaimed. Following a two day Rule 65 hearing and a five day bench trial, the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire found that…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart Corporation, Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- McCarthy v. AzureCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Donna Reilly, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Howard H. Gilbert, Jr. v. City of CambridgeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.