Legal Opinion

Beit v. PROBATE & FAMILY COURT DEPARTMENT

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 28, 1982PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

At issue is whether a judge may impose sanctions on an attorney who fails to appear for trial without having secured a timely continuance. The plaintiff, Mr. Harvey Beit, is an experienced member of the bar of this Commonwealth. On April 23, 1981, Mr. Beit failed to appear for a scheduled trial on a 1974 divorce libel. Mr. Beit had not obtained a timely continuance. The judge then assessed costs in the amount of $450 against Mr. Beit. Mr. Beit was not present at the time these costs were imposed. On appeal, Mr. Beit contends that a judge has no authority to assess costs except as authorized…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Waldman v. American Honda Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. HoppinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Cronin v. StrayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Gionfrido v. Wharf Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. Mailer v. MailerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API