Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Sullivan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 8, 1977PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.

The plaintiff Barbara A. Cameron, as ad-ministratrix of the estate of her husband Alan, brought an action against her attorney Edward M. Sullivan, defendant, based on G. L. c. 221, § 51: “An attorney at law who unreasonably neglects to pay over money collected by him for and in behalf of a client, when demanded by the client, shall forfeit to such client five times the lawful interest of the money from the time of the demand.” A jury trial in the Superior Court resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant appealed from the ensuing judgment, and the case is here by transfer on our…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Porter v. Clerk of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. McInerney v. Massasoit Greyhound Association, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  3. Treasurer & Receiver General v. SheehanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Vieira v. MeninoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Perkins v. BlakeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Guenard v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. McStowe v. BornsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Salem Realty Co. v. MateraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  4. Smith v. ConsalvoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  5. Taylor-Boren v. IsaacSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API