Legal Opinion

Franklin Fire Insurance v. Butts

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 5, 1931PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). It is first con-

tended that A. R. Crumb acquired an interest in the land by the tax sale in 1926 for the taxes of 1925, and that thereafter E. M. Butts was not the sole and unconditional owner of the property, and therefore the fire insurance policy was null and void. We do not agree with counsel for the insurance company in this contention. We set out in our statement of facts the substance of the “sole and unconditional ownership clause” of the policy. We do not deem it necessary to set out the clause in full for the reason that, under the facts of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Chase v. SwayneTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Davis v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. New York Life Insurance v. AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  5. Old Colony Life Insurance v. JulianSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Orange Brevard Plumbing & Heating Co. v. La CroixSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  2. City National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  3. Sims v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  4. Reinhardt v. Security Insurance Co. of New HavenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  5. Yadon v. YadonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API