Legal Opinion

Chase v. Swayne

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1895No. 281PublishedCited by 63 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Second District, in an appeal from Tarrant County.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

—Plaintiffs in error were husband and wife, and occupied and owned a homestead in the city of Fort Worth, upon which was their residence, and which they insured in various insurance companies to the amount of $60,000. The property was destroyed by fire. One of the policies on Chase’s house was issued by the Phoenix Insurance Company. Chase was indebted to John F. Swayne in the sum of $22,000, upon which judgment had been rendered. Swayne sued out a writ of garnishment against the Phoenix Insurance Company, which answered, setting up the facts, admitting the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. Lanier v. Foust and DouglassTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Riddick v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
  4. Wood v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Ogburn v. WhitlowTexas Supreme Court · 1891

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. GammonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Reed v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  3. Spence v. FenchlerTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Texas Farmers Insurance Co. v. MurphyTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. First Texas Savings Ass'n v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API