Legal Opinion

Reinhardt v. Security Insurance Co. of New Haven

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 1, 1941PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dady

This is an action to recover on a fire insurance policy and on the mortgage loss clause thereto attached, tried by the court without a jury. At the conclusion of the evidence offered by plaintiffs,, and without any evidence being offered by defendant, the trial court, on motion of defendant, entered judgment for defendant, from which judgment plaintiffs appeal.

On May 17, 1933, the defendant through A. S. Yien, its local agent, issued and delivered to plaintiffs Sebastian Huskamp and Rose Huskamp, who were husband and wife, its policy of insurance by which it agreed to insure them from May 17,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kelly v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Dickey, Tansley & Co. v. Pocomoke City National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  3. Phenix Insurance Co. v. GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Savage v. GreggIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Whiting v. BurkhardtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Thornton v. PaulIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Allstate Insurance v. National Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Sprouse v. North River InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Kintzel v. Wheatland Mutual Insurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  5. Waukegan Times Theatre Corp. v. ConradAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API