Legal Opinion

Frager v. Pecot

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1974No. 7095PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause concerning liability for damages sustained in an automobile collision came before the trial court upon cross-motions for summary judgment with the same statement of material facts as to which no genuine issue existed being a part of both motions. After a hearing plaintiff’s (appellant’s) 1 motion was denied and that of defendant (appellee) granted on the ground that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. We affirm.

Immediately before the accident in question the plaintiff was stopped at a red light in the eastbound middle lane of M Street, at its intersection…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. ClancyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. D. C. Transit System, Inc. v. HarrisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Mitchell v. Allied Cab CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Rogers v. CoxDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Mahnke v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Elam v. Ethical Prescription Pharmacy, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Massengale v. PittsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API