Frager v. Pecot
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
This cause concerning liability for damages sustained in an automobile collision came before the trial court upon cross-motions for summary judgment with the same statement of material facts as to which no genuine issue existed being a part of both motions. After a hearing plaintiff’s (appellant’s) 1 motion was denied and that of defendant (appellee) granted on the ground that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. We affirm.
Immediately before the accident in question the plaintiff was stopped at a red light in the eastbound middle lane of M Street, at its intersection…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. ClancyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- D. C. Transit System, Inc. v. HarrisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Mitchell v. Allied Cab CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
- Rogers v. CoxDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
3Cited by18 opinions
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Mahnke v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Elam v. Ethical Prescription Pharmacy, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Massengale v. PittsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.