Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Cox
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 27, 1950No. 949PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAGETT, Associate Judge.
This appeal' involves a judgment on a claim and counterclaim arising out of a collision between two automobiles in the intersection of Constitution Avenue and Fifteenth Street,- Washington,- D. C. The' amount of damage to each car was stipulated, and it was agreed that various District of Columbia traffic -regulations be admitted in evidence. The-trial court held as a fact that defendant Rogers was negligent-, that his negligence was the proximate cause of the accident, that plaintiff Cox was not guilty of contributory negligence, and therefore gave judgqient for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Nolan v. WerthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Danzansky v. ZimbolistCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Billingsley v. McCormick Transfer Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- National Trucking & Storage Co. v. DriscollDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lyons v. BarrazottoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Leiken v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Frager v. PecotDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Wilson v. BrameDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- District of Columbia v. MegginsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.