Legal Opinion

State v. Laycock

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 2009No. 20070503PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Certification from the Utah Court of Appeals

NEHRING, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

T1 In this case, we agreed to consider a petition for extraordinary writ filed by the State challenging a restitution ruling made by Judge Claudia Laycock in the Fourth District Court. Judge Laycock ordered *107Trenton Jones to pay approximately $3000 in restitution but declined to order Mr. Jones to pay almost $600,000 for lost wages that had been sought by the State. The State argues that Judge Layeock's ruling was at odds with the provisions of Utah Code sections 77-882-101 through -601, Utah's Crime Victims…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. BarrettUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Monson v. CarverUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Miller v. WeaverUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. BernalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Cabaness v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. OgdenUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. HorneUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Salt Lake County v. Holliday Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. LindbergUtah Supreme Court · 2010

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API